da bet nacional： Robin Jackman picks his South African XI of the 1980s
da realsbet： Roving Reporter by Chandrahas Choudhury27-Dec-2020It is often lamented that a generation of very fine South Africancricketers from the late 1970s and ’80s never played any international cricket – or, at best, a minuscule amount in the twilight of their careers, after South Africa’s readmission to world cricket in 1991. The only international sides that these players took on were the controversial so-called rebel teams from England, West Indies and Australia.Imagination, however, permits many things that reality does not. So whatif we were to imagine a South African team from that era themselvesrebelling against time, and landing up in the India of 2004 to play a Testseries? Which players would be on that team, and how would they fare? These questions were put to Robin Jackman, the former England player who is nowa familiar face (and voice) in India through his commentary work. He played in South Africa’s domestic Currie Cup matches for many years.”Jackers” took the matter so seriously that he asked to be allowed to ponder the question overnight. The next day he had a team neatly written down in black.”I’ll pick a South African side from the mid-1980s,” he said, “so thatwe stay within the limits of the exercise as I understand it, and don’tpick any players who played Tests for South Africa in the ’70s. Also,I began my tenure as coach of Western Province in 1985, so I was watchingthe domestic scene quite carefully then, and remember a lot of the playersquite well. So here’s my team to play India.”As my openers I’d take Jimmy Cook and Henry Fotheringham. Cook had atremendous technique, and made thousands of runs for Somerset on very goodpitches, similar to those you find in India. So he’d play quite well here,I think. Fotheringham was more workmanlike, but a fine player in his ownright, and a good foil for Cook.”At No. 3 I’d have to pick the leading batsman of my time in South Africancricket, Peter Kirsten. Peter was an attacking batsman with all thestrokes in the book, and a phenomenal player of spin. Kirsten could alsobowl a bit of offspin, rather like Virender Sehwag in the current Indianside – always useful as an option. And at 5 I’d have another fineplayer of spin, Ken McEwan. Both Peter and Ken had plenty of experience ofEnglish county cricket, and could adapt quickly to any conditions. They’denjoy taking on the Indian spinners.”At No. 4, in between Kirsten and McEwan, I’d pick Allan Lamb. I’m cheatinga little bit, because Lamb played plenty of Tests for England, but I’massuming he’d have played for South Africa if he’d been able to. Lamb wasa fine player of the quicks, and he made a lot of runs against the greatWest Indies team of the ’80s – just the right man to bat at the heartof the top order.”At 6 I’m picking Kevin McKenzie, Neil’s father. A high-class player, and one of the best hookers of the ball I’ve ever seen. And at 7 is my allrounder, Clive Rice. A good batsman and a very clever bowler, genuinely quick when he was young. Rice was also a very astute thinker on the game, so he’s my captain. And there’s not too much trouble over the wicketkeeper. Ray Jennings, the coach of the current team, was the best wicketkeeper in South Africa in his time.
Peter Kirsten: earns a place in the XI for having all the strokes© AFP
“Now for the bowlers. At No. 9 would be Garth Le Roux, Imran Khan’steam-mate at Sussex. Big, fast, bustling, aggressive; bowled a lot ofbouncers. Just right as your spearhead. Like a lot of fast bowlers, hecould also hit the ball a long way. And as Le Roux’s new-ball partner I’dpick Stephen Jefferies. If you want to conjure up an image of Jefferies,think of Irfan Pathan. Jefferies was very like him – similar build, samesort of pace, big swinger of the ball.”And the last man would have to be a spinner: the deadly accurate AlanKourie, of Transvaal. Kourie was not a big spinner of the ball, but thenyou don’t have to be on these pitches. It’s more important that you put itin the right places. I reckon he’d give the Indian batsmen some trouble.”So there you have it,” said Jackers, stubbing out his cigarette. “A goodbalanced side: six classy batsmen and an allrounder at No. 7; two finequicks in Le Roux and Jefferies; Rice at first change, and Kourie as thespinner, with Kirsten for a little offspin.”They’d be good enough to give your lot a pretty tough fight.”
